Skip to main content
CONHUBAIPROJECT INTELLIGENCE
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INTELLIGENCE

Turn a field condition into a review-ready RFI.
Keep the source and authority visible.

CONHUBAI helps Project Engineers, Project Managers, and Superintendents turn verified project context into controlled questions, review drafts, and accountable next actions—while existing construction systems remain the systems of record.

Source contextRevision awarenessNamed human reviewClear storage labels
THE SOURCE-BACKED RFI PATH

One condition. Three responsible roles. One controlled record.

The workflow starts with the field, strengthens the question, preserves human authority, and ends with direction that can be verified.

01

Capture the field condition

The Superintendent records the exact location, visible condition, affected work, and decision needed.

02

Check what is missing

CONHUBAI identifies missing references, measurements, attachments, authority, and schedule context before drafting.

03

Prepare the RFI record

The Project Engineer builds a source-backed question without inventing facts or hiding unresolved information.

04

Review authority and exposure

The Project Manager confirms scope, cost, schedule, contractual exposure, reviewer, and required response date.

05

Return direction to the field

Approved direction is connected to an owner, revision, date, and field-verification requirement.

THE PROJECT RECORD CHAIN

Context becomes a record. A record becomes a reviewed decision. A decision becomes accountable action.

CONHUBAI carries the source, revision, reviewer, status, authority, owner, date, and proof forward so the next person can understand what happened and why.

Review the complete example
  1. 01Use verified contextSeparate project facts from assumptions and missing information.
  2. 02Draft without inventingKeep unsupported details visible as questions or placeholders.
  3. 03Review before issueAI assistance stays separate from professional approval.
  4. 04Preserve ownershipEvery direction ends with an owner, date, revision, and proof.
THE PRODUCT BEHIND THE WORKFLOW

Keep the workspaces. Start with the outcome.

The five workspaces remain available, but each one now supports a clear project decision instead of competing for attention.

01

Project Adviser

Create or review RFIs, submittals, changes, emails, daily reports, schedules, safety plans, quality plans, meeting records, and closeout documents.

Include this in a pilot →
02

Projects

Keep project context, controlled records, actions, standards, roles, and issue authority connected.

Include this in a pilot →
03

Preconstruction

Build scope packages, structure estimates, level bids, attach source documents, and review readiness.

Include this in a pilot →
04

AI Review

Compare clearly labeled synthetic construction viewpoints while keeping final judgment with responsible people.

Include this in a pilot →
05

War Room

Review entered context and evidence coverage without claiming live system access or unsupported project-health scores.

Include this in a pilot →
CONTROLLED ACCESS

Choose the right path without mixing product modes.

The read-only example is public. Approved individual accounts and professionally scoped company pilots use separate access paths.

READ-ONLY EXAMPLE

Review the RFI workflow

See the complete field-to-decision path with sanitized project information. No account, upload, or unrestricted product access.

Open example
INDIVIDUAL ACCESS

Create or access an approved account

Use the Adviser, Learning, and career tools under the current account and purchase terms.

Account access
COMPANY PILOT

Scope one measurable workflow

Define users, security requirements, onboarding, baseline time, and success measures before activation.

Request pilot discussion