Skip to main content
CONHUBAIPROJECT INTELLIGENCE
Help
SupportFind an answer or contact Anchor SupportSecurityCurrent controls, data handling, and planned capabilitiesLegal & safetyPrivacy, terms, purchases, and responsible use
Request Pilot
Menu
WorkspacesProjectsProject truth, records, actions, and standardsAdvisersCreate, review, plan, and resolve with a specialistPreconstructionScope, estimate, bids, and readiness reviewAI ReviewCompare synthetic construction viewpoints for human reviewWar RoomReview entered context and evidence coverage without unsupported scoringLearnLearning CenterPractice decisions and build career evidenceFoundationsSee how project teams turn information into field actionWorkflowRFI ExampleSee a field condition become a controlled RFIExploreExploreCredentials, official guidance, training, tools, and career resourcesHelpSupportFind an answer or contact Anchor SupportSecurityCurrent controls, data handling, and planned capabilitiesLegal & safetyPrivacy, terms, purchases, and responsible useRequest PilotScope one paid, measured workflow
SANITIZED · READ-ONLY EXAMPLE

See one field issue become a controlled RFI.

This example uses fictionalized project information. It demonstrates the review path without creating an account, uploading a file, or implying that AI can approve project direction.

Start with the field conditionDiscuss a controlled pilot
01 · SUPERINTENDENT

Capture the condition before work proceeds.

Describe only what is known, connect evidence, and state the decision the field needs.

FIELD CONDITION
Location
Level 02 · Corridor B · Grid B-7
Observed condition
The duct elevation shown on M-211 conflicts with the ceiling elevation shown on A-402.
Affected work
Duct installation and ceiling framing in Corridor B.
Decision needed
Confirm the required routing or approved ceiling adjustment before installation.
Field status
Work held only in the affected area pending reviewed direction.
FIELD HANDOFF

What the Superintendent provides

  • Exact location and observable condition
  • Photograph and drawing references
  • Trade and sequence affected
  • Safe interim action and decision deadline

Human authority: The Superintendent controls the immediate field response; CONHUBAI does not issue direction.

02 · PROJECT ENGINEER

Check completeness before drafting.

The preflight separates usable facts from missing information and unsupported assumptions.

SUPPORTEDCondition and location

Field description, affected area, and current work status are specific.

SUPPORTEDDrawing references

A-402 Rev 6 and M-211 Rev 4 are identified for comparison.

VERIFYRequired decision date

Confirm when the affected sequence reaches the hold point.

VERIFYCost or schedule effect

Do not state an impact until the responsible team verifies it.

03 · REVIEW DRAFT

Prepare an answerable, source-backed RFI.

The draft preserves missing facts instead of inventing them.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Corridor B duct and ceiling elevation conflict

DRAFT FOR REVIEW

RFI number[Assign from system of record]

LocationLevel 02 · Corridor B · Grid B-7

Requested response[Confirm decision date]

Prepared byProject Engineer

Condition

M-211 Revision 4 indicates duct routing at an elevation that conflicts with the finished ceiling elevation indicated on A-402 Revision 6 at Corridor B, Grid B-7. The affected installation is held locally pending reviewed direction.

References reviewed

  • A-402 · Reflected Ceiling PlanRevision 6 · issued for constructionShows ceiling elevation and diffuser layout.
  • M-211 · Level 02 Duct PlanRevision 4 · issued for constructionShows main duct elevation through Corridor B.
  • Specification 23 31 00Issued Addendum 03Defines coordination and installation requirements.
  • Field photo FP-018Captured 2026-07-28 · sanitizedShows the above-ceiling condition at Grid B-7.

Requested direction

Confirm the required duct routing, approved ceiling adjustment, or other coordinated direction. Identify any revised drawing or detail that governs the installation.

Unresolved information

[Confirm decision date] · [Confirm whether a verified cost or schedule effect exists] · [Attach the approved field markup if created]

04 · PROJECT MANAGER

Review authority, exposure, and issue readiness.

Source controlDrawing and specification revisions are named.Ready
Question qualityOne condition and one requested decision are stated.Ready
Commercial exposureCost impact remains unclaimed until verified.Verify
Schedule exposureRequired response date must be confirmed against the current sequence.Verify
Issue authorityThe designated project reviewer must approve the RFI before transmittal.Human review
05 · CONTROLLED RETURN TO FIELD

Connect approved direction to accountable action.

CONHUBAI can organize the handoff, but approved project direction must come from the responsible authority and remain in the project system of record.

DIRECTIONAttach the approved response and governing revision.
OWNERNamed Project Engineer communicates the response.
FIELD CHECKSuperintendent verifies the direction is buildable at Grid B-7.
PROOFRecord date, revision, photo, and installation verification.
Scope this workflow for a pilotReview security and data handling